Home › For Families
For parents, carers and familiesYour children are already using it — for homework, for curiosity, sometimes for company. The question is no longer whether they will. It is whether anyone has taught them how, and whether you have the language to be part of it.
Not a ban. Not a free-for-all. Capability, with boundaries you can actually hold.
Protection matters. Children do form attachments to chatbots, do hand over information they shouldn't, and do quietly stop doing their own thinking. Those risks are real and this page does not minimise them.
But a household organised entirely around prevention has a predictable failure mode: the use goes underground. Children stop asking, because asking means losing access. And you lose the thing that actually protects them — being someone they will show a strange conversation to.
The families who do best treat it as capability-building. Boundaries, yes — and alongside them, the skill to notice when an answer is wrong, the habit of keeping some things private, and the confidence to say "I want to do this bit myself."
Their thinking, their privacy, their relationships, and their sense of being responsible for their own work.
The judgment to use a powerful tool well — which they will need for the rest of their lives, whatever it is called by then.
A household where AI use is visible and discussable, rather than something that happens behind a closed door.
You do not need a separate parenting theory for this. The SAFE AI Use Framework™ works at home with the vocabulary changed.
Agree in advance where AI is welcome and where it isn't — which rooms, which times, which kinds of schoolwork, and what never gets typed into it.
Let them use it for the things it is genuinely good at — explaining a concept a different way, practising a language, getting unstuck on a first draft.
Teach the reflex of checking. "How would we find out if that's true?" is a better lesson than any rule you could write down.
Keep the authorship with them. The work should still be theirs, the friendships should still be human, and the decisions should still be made by people.
Start free. The course is there when you want the whole thing worked through properly.
If you have not yet talked about it at home, start with AI Without the Panic. It is written for adults who feel behind — which is most of us — and it gives you enough footing to open the subject without pretending to expertise you don't have.
Children calibrate to what they observe, not what they are told. The assessment shows where your own reliance and boundaries sit — which is worth knowing before you set rules for someone else.
Includes a full chapter on children and family safety: age-appropriate boundaries, family AI agreement templates, scripts for the conversation at any age, and how to recognise manipulation, misinformation and dependency patterns.
The parenting course for the AI age. Six modules that take you from "I don't know what they're using" to a household with agreed rules, a shared vocabulary, and a parent who can spot trouble early.
No prior knowledge assumed. Nothing you need to install. Designed to be done in the gaps you actually have.
Which tools they are already using, where they meet them, and what that actually means for you.
Rules that are practical and enforceable, plus family AI agreement templates you fill in together.
Recognising manipulation, misinformation and the dependency patterns that build quietly over months.
What your child is sharing, where it goes, and how to make "don't type that in" a habit rather than a lecture.
Scripts for talking about AI at any age — including when you do not know the answer yourself.
Structure, Accelerate, Filter, Empower — turned into a household habit rather than a poster on the fridge.
“I went from anxious to equipped. I finally understood what my kids were doing with AI — and had the language to talk to them about it.”
Parent, Lagos“The family AI agreement template alone was worth the whole course. We sat down as a family and actually agreed on rules together.”
Mother of three, AbujaA ban you cannot enforce teaches children to hide their use rather than ask for help — and it removes you from the conversation at exactly the point they most need you in it. Bounded, visible use beats invisible use. If you do decide on a full ban for a younger child, that can be the right call; just make it a decision you revisit rather than a permanent position.
There is no single number, and anyone who gives you one is guessing. What matters is the match between the child and the use: what they are using it for, whether they can evaluate what comes back, what happens if it is wrong, and whether an adult is close enough to notice. A twelve-year-old using it to practise Spanish and a twelve-year-old using it as a confidant are not the same situation.
Look for replacement rather than support: schoolwork they can no longer attempt unaided, emotional weight placed on a chatbot rather than on people, reluctance to show you a conversation. Dependence is a pattern over months, not a single odd incident — which is why noticing early matters more than reacting hard.
Our resources are educational and not clinical. If you are worried about a child's wellbeing, please speak to a qualified professional.
If your child's school has not yet worked out its position on AI, they may be glad someone asked. We run programs for schools, and parents are often the ones who start the conversation.